Legal Opinion
Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 10, 2013No. 2012-5008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States Court of Federal Claims determined that the Army Corps of Engineers did not effect a regulatory taking compensable under the Fifth Amendment when it denied Lost Tree Village Corporation’s application for a permit to fill wetlands on its 4.99 acre plat (Plat 57). In reaching this conclusion, the Court of Federal Claims found Lost Tree’s parcel as a whole includes Plat 57, a neighboring upland plat (Plat 55), and scattered wetlands in the vicinity owned by Lost Tree at the time the permit was denied. Because the Court of Federal Claims erred in its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- 2910 Georgia Avenue LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.