Legal Opinion

Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 1, 2015No. 2014-5093PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNA, Circuit Judge.

On remand from Lost Tree Village Corp. v. United States (“Lost Tree I ”), 707 F.3d 1286 (Fed.Cir.2013), the Court of Federal Claims held that the government’s denial of Lost Tree Village Corporation’s application for a permit to fill wetlands on a 4.99 acre plat (“Plat 57”) constituted a per se regulatory taking under Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal, 505 U.S. 1003, 112 S.Ct. 2886, 120 L.Ed.2d 798 (1992), and, alternatively, a regulatory taking under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104, 98 S.Ct. 2646, 57 L.Ed.2d 631 (1978). We affirm that a Lucas…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use Comm.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Gennadiy Nekrilov v. City of Jersey CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  3. Reoforce, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement & Right-of-Way Over 6.09 Acres of LandDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
  5. State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. Mertz (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API