Legal Opinion
United States v. Trujillo-Alvarez
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 29, 2012No. Case No. 3:12-CR-00469-SIPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SIMON, District Judge.
This case requires the Court to reconcile the Bail Reform Act of 1984 (“BRA”), as amended, 18 U.S.C. § 3141, et seq., with the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1101, et seq. A reconciliation is necessary because a tension has emerged in the application of these two laws by two separate departments within the Executive Branch, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
The Office of the U.S. Attorney, which is part of the U.S. Department of Justice, is the government’s primary agency responsible…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Jaime Vasquez-BenitezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Ernesto Santos-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. LettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Ailon-AilonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Cesar Veloz-AlonsoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.