United States v. Ernesto Santos-Flores
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Defendant Ernesto Santos-Flores appeals the district court’s order of detention pending trial. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We hold that the district court erred in ordering pretrial detention based on the likelihood that, if released pending trial, Santos-Flores would be placed in immigration detention and removed from the United States, precluding his appearance for trial. We affirm the district court’s detention order, however, based on the district court’s alternative, individualized analysis of factors that make Santos-Flores a voluntary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Laura Luis Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Amir Masoud MotamediCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Angel Lopez-Valenzuela v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Wayne Patrick GebroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Ilma Soriano NunezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Ailon-AilonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Resendiz-GuevaraDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Thomas v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Barrera-LandaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.