Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Winfrey v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 2008No. SC 88825PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Has a person taken “money or anything of value in or from the gambling games” in violation of section 313.830.4(9) RSMo 2000 1, if that person purchases casino chips and then fraudulently exchanges those chips for a cash payment in excess of the face value of the casino chips? Such conduct does not constitute a violation of section 313.830.4(9). Therefore, the circuit court clearly erred in overruling Eric Winfrey’s motion to set aside his plea of guilty to violating section 313.830.4(9). The judgment is reversed.

FACTS

Eric Winfrey pled guilty to one count of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. GrubbSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. State v. LloydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. State v. NibargerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. ChampagneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. StallingsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API