Legal Opinion

Smith v. Laatsch

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1885PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Effingham county; the Hon. William C. Jones, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mulkey

Thomas H. Smith and Belle W. Sullivan, plaintiffs in error, on thé 17th day of April, 1884, brought an action of ejectment, in the Effingham circuit court, against Charlotte and Ferdinand Laatsch, defendants in error, for the recovery of the east half of the south-west quarter of section 29, in township 7, north, range 4, east. The declaration was in the usual form, and the general issue, alone, pleaded. The cause, by agreement of parties, was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a finding and judgment for the defendants, to reverse which the plaintiffs have brought this writ of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huls v. BuntinIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Holbrook v. BrennerIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Walter v. Northern Insurance of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Bradley v. LightcapIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. K. Miller Const. Co., Inc. v. McGinnisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Rudolph v. RudolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Fossum v. StarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API