Legal Opinion

Huls v. Buntin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1868PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Writ or Error to the Oircuit Court of Crawford county; the Hon. Aarort Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This was an action of ejectment, for the recovery of the north-east quarter of Sec. 29, Township 6 north, Bange 10 west, in' Crawford county. The cause was tried at the April term, 1867, by the court and a jury. On the trial, plaintiff in error offered to read in evidence the book filed in the county clerk’s office, giving the names of the purchasers and the date of each entry of lands in the county, for the purpose of proving that Samuel Shaw had entered the land and become the purchaser thereof in eighty acre tracts in the years 3828 and 1829. He also proved that search had been made and…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Haywood v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Swann v. ThayerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Smith v. LaatschIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Rigor v. FryeIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Whitman v. HeneberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API