Legal Opinion

State v. Samuel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1975No. 7521SC499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in granting the State’s motion to consolidate the cases against defendant and the case against Dean for trial. We find no merit in the assignment.

It is well settled in this jurisdiction that the question of consolidation of indictments against defendants charged with committing similar offenses at the same time and place is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. State v. Wright, 270 N.C. 158, 153 S.E. 2d 883 (1967) ; State v. Johnson, 280 N.C. 700, 187 S.E. 2d 98 (1972) ; State v. Arney, 23 N.C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. . BonnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Lindstrom v. ChesnuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MilbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. SellarsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API