Legal Opinion

State v. Milby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1981No. 134PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

Because of defendants’ failure to preserve for our review the other assignments of error which they presented to the Court of Appeals by bringing them forward in their new briefs, see N.C. R. App. P. 16, only one question is properly before this court for our consideration: Did the Court of Appeals commit error in awarding defendants new trials because of the introduction into evidence by the state of two handguns which had been seized at the time of their arrest? We conclude that the Court of Appeals was in error, and, accordingly, we reverse its decision.

The handguns in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Consolidated Vending Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API