Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. Chesnutt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1972No. 7214SC281PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

By their sixth assignment of error, appellants challenge the correctness of the court’s allowing third party defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. The original defendants filed a third party complaint alleging that if the third party plaintiff should be found to be negligent in construction of the house, “the third party defendant was guilty of joint and concurring negligence, which combined with that of the third party plaintiff in proximately causing the plaintiff’s injury, in that improper and faulty installation of the furnace system by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Theis v. HeuerIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Pasour v. PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Hartley v. BallouCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Gillespie v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API