Legal Opinion
New York v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 14, 2002No. 83-CV-1401CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
CURTIN, District Judge.
Presently before the court are four motions related to a third-party action brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq. Third-party defendants Bay State Smelting Company, Inc. (“Bay State”) and Benjamin Sack (“Sack”) have filed a motion for summary judgment against third-party plaintiff Solvent Chemical Company, Inc. (“Solvent”) on Solvent’s claims against them. Item 1032. Bay State and Sack (collectively, the “Bay State defendants”) argue that neither is liable to Solvent…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berg v. PophamAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- New York v. AdamowiczDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Morton International, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Berg v. PophamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Morton International, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003