Berg v. Popham
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Ninth Circuit has certified the following two questions to this court:
1. Alaska Statute section 46.03.822(a)(4), in contrast to 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(3), contains the word “or” preceding the phrase “by any other party or entity.” In light of the inclusion of the word “or,” does section 46.03.822(a)(4) require that a person own, possess, have “authority to control,” or “have a duty to dispose of’ the hazardous substance that is released, before that entity can be subject to arranger liability as is required under 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(3)?
2. If the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- 3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Amcast Industrial Corporation and Elkhart Products Corporation v. Detrex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vine Street, LLC v. Keeling Ex Rel. Estate of KeelingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Federal Insurance v. American Hardware Mutual InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Moses Lake v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2006
- Edenshaw v. Safeway, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.