Winchester v. Parm.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The objection which the defendant makes to the complainant's title hinges upon the validity of the title conveyed by the sheriff in the foreclosure proceedings as against the deed delivered by Richardson to the Underwriters Realty and Mortgage Company. Both the mortgage and deed were recorded on the same day. The mortgage was noted on the record as recorded at 11:35 A. M. of that day (the statute, Sec. 1380, Revised Code 1915, quoted infra, required this); but no notation of the hour of recording was noted upon the record of the deed, the statute requiring none.
The defendant contends that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Levin v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Daly v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- State v. MayhewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
- Trustees of the Catholic Cathedral Church v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Handler Construction, Inc. v. CoreStates Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Widder v. LeedsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
- Conly v. Industrial Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- Guarantee Bank v. Magness Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Satterthwaite v. JackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973