Legal Opinion
Widder v. Leeds
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided March 1, 1974PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Vice Chancellor.
William V. Leeds, one of the Defendants named in this action, has moved to vacate an order of sequestration entered by this Court on July 5, 1973. The sequestration order, made pursuant to 10 Del.C. § 366 for the purpose of compelling Leeds to appear in this State and to answer the complaint against him, attached a limited partnership interest in Courtland Manor Associates, a Delaware limited partnership. The interest sequestered is owned of record in the sole name of William V. Leeds.
Leeds seeks to have the order vacated for two reasons. First, although he acknowledges…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jacobs v. TenneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
- In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Wightman v. San Francisco Bay Toll-Bridge Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- In re Northeastern Water Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
- duPont v. duPontCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beal Bank, SSB v. Almand and AssociatesSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Diamond v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Internal Revenue Service v. Donald Gaster and Mary Ann Gaster v. Ninth Ward Savings Bank, Fsb , Third-Party Mary Ann Gaster , in Nos. 94-7195 and 94-7196. Nos. 94-7195, 94-7196Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Harry David Zutz Insurance Inc. v. H. M. S. Associates, Ltd.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
- Wehrheim v. BrentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.