Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Hurt, III
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 8, 2003No. 02-30297PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Clarence Hurt, III, appeals a district court order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to twelve months of imprisonment, followed by an additional twenty-four months of supervised release. The district court denied Hurt’s motion to amend his sentence to impose the maximum statutory penalty of twenty-four months’ incarceration with no supervised release, despite the acquiescence in Hurt’s motion by the U.S. Attorney and the U.S. Probation Officer. We conclude that the district court was not required to impose the maximum penalty that both parties…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert James MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roderic E. SPRAGUE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Edward BaheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Jawad MiqbelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Shawn GementeraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jose Angel Gutierrez-SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Barrera-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.