Legal Opinion
United States v. Jawad Miqbel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 2006No. 05-10033PublishedCited by 178 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
Jawad Miqbel appeals the sentence imposed by the district court on the grounds that the court failed to set forth sufficient reasons for its imposition of a sentence outside the recommended range, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c), and that the sentence was unreasonable because it was imposed to provide “just punishment,” a factor he alleges to be impermissible in revocation sentencing. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
I
On February 21, 2001, Jawad Miqbel pled guilty to a charge of conspiracy to possess a listed chemical with knowledge and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Daniel Lee FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge VENCES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- United States v. BoldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Christopher Devon CrudupCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Austin Webb, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. James RattoballiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.