Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Bahe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2000No. 99-10014PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises from a clerical error in one part of 18 U.S.C, § 3583(d), the statute that authorizes a district court to impose discretionary conditions of supervised release following imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). In so authorizing a district court, § 3583(d) refers to certain subsections of 18 U.S.C. § 3563(b), the statute that authorizes the discretionary imposition of conditions of probation. Section 3583(d) specifically refers to § 3563(b)(1) through (b)(10) and (b)(12) through (b)(20). Conspicuously absent is a reference to subsection (b)(ll).

Appella…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Johnny Lee NapierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. In re People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  5. United States v. D'AmarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API