United States v. Edward Bahe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from a clerical error in one part of 18 U.S.C, § 3583(d), the statute that authorizes a district court to impose discretionary conditions of supervised release following imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). In so authorizing a district court, § 3583(d) refers to certain subsections of 18 U.S.C. § 3563(b), the statute that authorizes the discretionary imposition of conditions of probation. Section 3583(d) specifically refers to § 3563(b)(1) through (b)(10) and (b)(12) through (b)(20). Conspicuously absent is a reference to subsection (b)(ll).
Appella…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Johnny Lee NapierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In re People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- United States v. D'AmarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.