Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert James Miller

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1983No. 82-1443PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, Circuit Judge:

This case examines the discretion of a district court judge to reject plea bargains in which the prosecution has agreed to dismiss all except one count of a multiple count indictment. Here, by categorically rejecting all one-count pleas to multiple count indictments, the district court has abdicated its duty to exercise discretion by considering every case individually. We remand and direct the court to exercise its discretion in compliance with this opinion. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE

Appellant Robert Miller was indicted for three counts of armed bank robbery in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Michael Lawrence PollockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Sixto Humberto Sanchez, United States of America v. Reyes Acebes Barajas, United States of America v. Richard T. TerronesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API