Legal Opinion

McCauley v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Associaton

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1998No. G018411PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

The private “bounty hunter” provisions of California’s Political Reform Act of 1974 allow private individuals to sue organizations which raise money to advocate positions on ballot initiatives for reporting errors. The decision of the United States Supreme Court involving an Ohio case, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n (1995) 514 U.S. 334 [115 S.Ct. 1511, 131 L.Ed.2d 426] (striking down statute outlawing anonymous campaign literature), raises thorny problems involving the constitutionality of California’s reporting statute, at least as it applies to private organizations…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Barrington v. A. H. Robins Co.California Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Governor Gray Davis Committee v. American Taxpayers AllianceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. DiQuisto v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Davaloo v. State Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API