Legal Opinion

Davaloo v. State Farm Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 2005No. B171352, B171353PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 340.9 1 revives certain time-barred claims for policy benefits against insurers for losses caused by the January 17, 1994 Northridge earthquake and provides a cause of action on such a claim may be commenced within one year of the statute’s January 1, 2001 effective date. On December 31, 2001, at the end of section 340.9’s revival period, the insureds in the instant coordinated cases, Homie Davaloo and Maurice and Suzie Abdel-Messih, filed complaints against State Farm Insurance Company purporting to seek relief for alleged damage to their…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Smeltzley v. Nicholson Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Santamarina, Guiller v. Sears RoebuckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Pointe San Diego Residential Community L.P. v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Merritt v. DitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Scholes v. Lambirth Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API