Legal Opinion

United States v. Jennings

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 22, 1995No. Docket No. 1043PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order of the Court in response to Motions For Withdrawal of Appellate Defense Counsel, Assignment of Substitute Counsel, and Filing of Materials Under United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (CMA 1982)

BAUM, Chief Judge:

Background

On 9 June 1995, in response to Appellant’s third motion for an enlargement of time to *765continue a quest for civilian appellate representation that was raised initially in January 1995, this Court concluded that further delay for that reason was not warranted and ordered an enlargement of time until 31 July 1995 for the express purpose of having Detailed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. LeaverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. BellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. ClaxtonU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. JenningsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  2. United States v. JenningsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. United States v. JenningsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API