United States v. Jennings
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order of the Court in response to Motions For Withdrawal of Appellate Defense Counsel, Assignment of Substitute Counsel, and Filing of Materials Under United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (CMA 1982)
BAUM, Chief Judge:
Background
On 9 June 1995, in response to Appellant’s third motion for an enlargement of time to *765continue a quest for civilian appellate representation that was raised initially in January 1995, this Court concluded that further delay for that reason was not warranted and ordered an enlargement of time until 31 July 1995 for the express purpose of having Detailed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. LeaverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. BellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. ClaxtonU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. JenningsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. JenningsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. JenningsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998