Legal Opinion
Hoskins v. Howard University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 20, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1779PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Saflya Hoskins brings this action against the defendants asserting claims for sexual harassment, hostile work environment, retaliation, and discrimination based on gender pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2006), as well as tort claims under District of Columbia common law. 1 See Complaint and Prayer for Jury Trial (“Compl.”) ¶ 1. Currently before the Court are the motions of defendants Howard University (“Howard”) and Barron Harvey to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Scott v. District Hospital Partners, L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Frett v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Lockhart v. Coastal International Security, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Mpoy v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.