Legal Opinion

Beatty v. State Board of Undertakers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1945No. Appeal, 24PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Hoeace Steen,

Section 10 of the Act of June 10,1931, P. L. 485, provides that when a license has been refused, suspended or revoked by the State Board of Undertakers there is a right of appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, but “The action of said court shall be final”. The scope of our review on appeal is accordingly limited to a consideration of the jurisdiction of the court below and the regularity of the proceedings: Grime v. Department of Public Instruction, 324 Pa. 371, 188 A. 337; State Board of Undertakers v. Frankenfield, 329 Pa. 440, 198 A. 302.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. State Board of Undertakers v. FrankenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Quesenberry v. EstepWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Allen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. McKinley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API