Legal Opinion
Vershbow v. Reiner
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1991No. B049614PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J.
The judgment creditor in this case sought a judicial order authorizing the sale of real property she had attached to satisfy the judgment. The trial court denied the request, reasoning that the writ of attachment was invalid because the clerk of the court had issued it without requiring the creditor to post a bond. We affirm.
Facts
In 1983, appellant Peggy Vershbow instituted a breach of contract action against C.H.P. Holding Company and Blake Holding Company, among others, for failure to pay her a real estate sales commission. Judgment in the amount of $67,500 was given to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Stewart v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Nakasone v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pangborn Plumbing Corp. v. Carruthers & SkiffingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Epstein v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Jordan-Lyon Productions, Ltd. v. Cineplex Odeon Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Hobbs v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Schools Excess Liability Fund v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004