Legal Opinion

Pangborn Plumbing Corp. v. Carruthers & Skiffington

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 2002No. B144972PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

In this case, we address the issue of the relative priorities and enforcement of a judgment lien and a competing contractual lien for attorney’s fees claimed by the debtor’s law firm for its work in creating the very fund from which the creditor seeks to satisfy its judgment lien. For the reasons discussed below, in this factually complex case, we conclude that the law firm’s contractual lien has priority.

Factual and Procedural Background

American Benefit Plan Administrators (Benefit Administrators) sued Pangborn Plumbing Corporation and R. Pangborn (collectively Pangborn)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bluxome Street Associates v. FIREMAN'S FUND INS.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Del Conte Masonry Co. v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Critzer v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Gilman v. DalbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Oldham v. California Capital Fund, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API