Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Abrams

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1997No. B108279PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Appellant Lawrence M. Lebowsky was the attorney of record for defendants and cross-complainants Steven G. Abrams, Alan Abrams (Steven’s son), and Abrams Veterinary Corporation, in the present action brought by plaintiffs and respondents Alan Epstein, and Devonshire Veterinary Clinic, Inc. Appellant was successful in obtaining summary judgment on behalf of Alan Abrams and in securing an award of attorney fees in Alan Abrams’s favor; Alan Abrams was dismissed from the lawsuit. The action proceeded between the remaining Abrams defendants and the plaintiffs.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Haupt v. Charlie's Kosher MarketCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Siciliano v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Little v. Amber Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Pangborn Plumbing Corp. v. Carruthers & SkiffingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Pacific Decision Sciences Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Casa Eva I Homeowners Ass'n v. Ani Construction & Tile, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Landstar Global Logistics, Inc. v. Robinson & Robinson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API