Legal Opinion

Rhodenbaugh v. City of Bayport

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 23, 1990No. C8-89-1330PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM J. FLEMING, Judge.

Appellant City of Bayport sought to assess respondents’ property for the entire cost of a sanitary sewer extension. Respondents objected to the assessment due to failure of the city to follow statutory requirements prior to ordering the improvement. The trial court held that the city had failed to comply with statutory requirements for ordering the improvement, and that this failure rendered the assessment against respondents’ property invalid.

Judgment was entered against the city on April 24, 1989, and this appeal followed.

FACTS

Respondents William and Judy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Lindahl v. Independent School District No. 306Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nastrom v. City of BlaineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API