Prince v. MacDonald
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Patricia Gormely Prince alleged several theories of liability against defendants after the parties’ employment relationship ended acrimoniously. Plaintiff prevailed on her breach of contract claim and her stock valuation claim. She did not, however, prevail on her religious discrimination claim and she cross appeals, raising evidentiary issues with regard to that claim. While defendant MacDonald & Goren, PC., prevailed on its counterclaim against plaintiff for breach of fiduciary duty, it was sanctioned jointly and severally with defendant Harold MacDonald for litigant misconduct.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cummings v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Msr Exploration, Ltd. v. Meridian Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by69 opinions
- People v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Gorman v. American Honda Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re HudsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bryan v. JPMorgan Chase BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.