Legal Opinion
Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1998No. Docket Nos. 185598, 186646, and 191951PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Per curiam
This case returns to this Court after remand and represents the latest chapter in the continuing saga of the Elks’ attempts to prohibit female members. The underlying issues involve § 302 of the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2302; MSA 3.548(302), which prohibits the denial of access to, and enjoyment of, services provided by places of public accommodation and public service because of gender. This case also raises issues involving attorney fees.
In Docket No. 185598, defendant, the Elks, appeals as of right and plaintiff, Sharon Sehellenberg, cross appeals from the order of May 2, 1995, which…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Prince v. MacDonaldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wilcoxon v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Diamond v. WitherspoonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Augustine v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.