Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
In this case we consider the essential authority of trial courts to control the proceedings before them. The issue in this case pertains to the extent of a trial court’s authority to govern the conduct of counsel and their clients in court proceedings. Where the Michigan Constitution authorizes us to make rules to govern court proceedings, the authority to enforce those rules inescapably follows. At the heart of preserving an organized polity, we must attend to relevant issues, including concerns over belligerent, antagonistic, or incompetent lawyering. To this end, we affirm the authority of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. NorfleetMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. AnsteyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.