State v. Berryman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
In this petition for review under Rule 32, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure (“Rule(s)”), we deny relief on petitioner’s claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We hold that the state is not required, as an element of the offense of misconduct with weapons, to disprove the existence of statutory exceptions to the definitions of “firearm” and “prohibited weapon.”
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A jury convicted John William Berryman (“defendant”) of one count of misconduct with weapons, a class 4 felony, for possessing a prohibited weapon, a sawed-off…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. WillitsArizona Supreme Court · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kirksey v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Date v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- May v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.