State v. Young
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
FIDEL, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant Kelvin T. Young appeals his conviction for knowingly possessing a prohibited weapon — a shotgun that had been sawed off to an overall length and a barrel length that were shorter than Arizona law permits. The shotgun, though disassembled and inoperable, was not irreparably so. We consider on appeal, among other issues, whether, to prove the culpable mental state of knowing possession of a prohibited weapon, the State must establish a defendant’s knowledge (1) of the prohibited characteristics of the weapon or (2) that the weapon is not permanently…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. TeagleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. SeyrafiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.