Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 7, 1998No. 1 CA-CR 96-0806PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FIDEL, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant Kelvin T. Young appeals his conviction for knowingly possessing a prohibited weapon — a shotgun that had been sawed off to an overall length and a barrel length that were shorter than Arizona law permits. The shotgun, though disassembled and inoperable, was not irreparably so. We consider on appeal, among other issues, whether, to prove the culpable mental state of knowing possession of a prohibited weapon, the State must establish a defendant’s knowledge (1) of the prohibited characteristics of the weapon or (2) that the weapon is not permanently…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. TeagleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. SeyrafiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API