Legal Opinion
State v. Kelly
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 25, 2005No. 2 CA-SA 2005-0018PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, J.
¶ 1 The State of Arizona seeks special action relief from the respondent judge’s order, entered in the underlying criminal prosecution of real party in interest Seymour Abdul-lah for unlawful possession of a firearm by a prohibited possessor, ascribing to the state the burden of proving Abdullah’s right to possess firearms has not been restored. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.
¶ 2 Abdullah apparently has been charged with three counts of weapons misconduct for possessing a deadly weapon by a prohibited possessor. 1 A person commits…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Augustin Alvarez, Oscar Hernandez, Mario C. Simon, Rolando Rios, Ramon Raymond, Eduardo Portal, Victoriano Concepcion, A/K/A "Macho"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- State v. HydeArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Vielma v. Eureka CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Patrick G. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CampoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Kenneth T. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State of Arizona v. Dominic Rodolpho FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Guillermo E. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.