Legal Opinion

Jones v. Armeling

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1924No. 1077PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

This is a proceeding in error to review a judgment rendered on the verdict of a jury against the plaintiff in error, the defendant below. The errors alleged are such as could have been properly assigned as grounds for a new trial, and the motion for a new trial is not embraced in the bill of exceptions. The proceeding, therefore, under our rule, presents nothing that will be considered by this court. Sup. Ct. Rule 13, 29 Wyo. 552; Rubel v. Willey, 5 Wyo. 427, 40 Pac. 761. The bill of exceptions recites that plaintiff in error’s motion for a new trial was denied, and that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seng v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Chatterton v. BonelliWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Rubel v. WilleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Burns v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SkaugNevada Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kramer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Posvar v. PearceWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Ex Parte SkaugNevada Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Skaug v. SheehyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API