Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Skaug
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1945No. 3449PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On the 18th day of October 1944 an information was filed in the Second judicial district court, in and for the county of Washoe, charging petitioner with the crime of murder in the first degree. On the 19th day of October 1944 the time set for arraignment, the petitioner appeared, and upon being informed by the court of his right to counsel before being arraigned, said that he did not think it was any use to appoint an attorney to represent him, but the court, bearing in mind the nature of the charge in the information, appointed Martin J. Scan-lan, Esq., a member of the bar of Washoe…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- People v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. LovelessNevada Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. LuisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- United States v. Maquel Sarbia, AKA Jesus VizcarraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ex Parte SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- FIGUEROA-BELTRAN VS. U.S. OF AMERICA (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Skaug v. SheehyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.