State v. Bonnewell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Judge.
¶ 1 Kurt Bonnewell, Lauralu Harkins, Lee P. Hulsey, and Walter John Randall (“Defendants”) were convicted of setting a leghold trap on public land in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section iY-SOlfDXl), 1 a class two misdemeanor. On appeal, they argue that the statute is a special or local law in violation of the Arizona Constitution and that it violates the equal protection clauses of the Arizona and United States Constitutions.
¶ 2 We hold that A.R.S. section 17-301(D) is not an unconstitutional local or special law because it rationally furthers…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- State v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Trust v. County of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. PoshkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State of Arizona v. Kwame Roy LoweryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.