Legal Opinion

State v. Bonnewell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 7, 1999No. 1 CA-CR 98-0973, 1 CA-CR 98-0977 to 1 CA-CR 98-0979PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Judge.

¶ 1 Kurt Bonnewell, Lauralu Harkins, Lee P. Hulsey, and Walter John Randall (“Defendants”) were convicted of setting a leghold trap on public land in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section iY-SOlfDXl), 1 a class two misdemeanor. On appeal, they argue that the statute is a special or local law in violation of the Arizona Constitution and that it violates the equal protection clauses of the Arizona and United States Constitutions.

¶ 2 We hold that A.R.S. section 17-301(D) is not an unconstitutional local or special law because it rationally furthers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
  2. State v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Trust v. County of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. PoshkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State of Arizona v. Kwame Roy LoweryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API