Legal Opinion
Trust v. County of Yuma
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 3, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 01-0415PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, Judge.
¶ 1 Braden Trust planned to construct farm-worker housing on its farm and believed that under state law it was not required to obtain building permits from Yuma County for the construction. The County disagreed. The trial court ruled that Braden Trust is exempt from the permit requirements because the farm-worker housing is incidental to farming and agriculture. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Braden Trust owns farm property in Yuma County known as Texas Hill Farms. Braden Trust approached the Yuma County Department of Development…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- City of South Lake Tahoe, Roger Capri, as Mayor of the City of South Lake Tahoe v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, and Gordon HooperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Pawn 1st, LLC v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.