State of Arizona v. Kwame Roy Lowery
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLY, Judge.
¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Kwame Lowery was convicted of failure to register as a sex offender. On appeal, he argues the state did not present sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict; the trial court committed fundamental error by allowing a detective’s testimony interpreting Arizona’s sex offender registration statute, A.R.S. § 13-3821; and the registration statute is facially unconstitutional and violates his right to equal protection. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PanosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Brush & Nib v. PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. MonfeliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. OronaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.