Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Kwame Roy Lowery

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 31, 2012No. 2 CA-CR 2012-0059PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLY, Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Kwame Lowery was convicted of failure to register as a sex offender. On appeal, he argues the state did not present sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict; the trial court committed fundamental error by allowing a detective’s testimony interpreting Arizona’s sex offender registration statute, A.R.S. § 13-3821; and the registration statute is facially unconstitutional and violates his right to equal protection. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PanosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Brush & Nib v. PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. State v. MonfeliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. State v. OronaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API