Legal Opinion

In Re Pruitt

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided December 9, 1999No. 09-99-526 CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DON BURGESS, Justice.

This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. Andrea Jane Pruitt filed her application for writ of habeas corpus with this court alleging her confinement was illegal because she was not afforded a court appointed attorney. This court, without the benefit of the entire record, considered the application, was of the tentative opinion that the writ should issue and admitted Ms. Pruitt to bail pending the final resolution of her application.

The court below found Ms. Pruitt in contempt for failing to allow her ex-husband child visitation on seven different occasions and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RohlederTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ex Parte HelmsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Ex Parte HoskenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Ex Parte LoweryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Bureau of CorrectionsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  2. In Re Lausch, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  3. In Re Marks, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  4. In Re Kailyn Andrews v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2025
  5. in Re Darrell Lausch, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API