Legal Opinion

In Re Marks

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided April 19, 2012No. 02-12-00129-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL MEIER, Justice.

I. Introduction

This is a habeas corpus proceeding. The primary issue before us is whether Relator William J. Marks knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel. Because we hold that the totality of circumstances demonstrates that Marks did waive his right to counsel, we overrule Marks’s sole issue and deny his requested relief.

II. Background

The trial court held a hearing on Real Party in Interest’s, Rebecca Blocker (RPI), Third Amended Motion for Enforcement of Child Support on March 23, 2012. At the beginning of the hearing, the following colloquy took…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Donald A. Ridgway v. T.L. Baker, Potter County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Ex Parte Occhipenti, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  4. Ex Parte SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ex Parte AckerTexas Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re David Mark Loyd v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
  2. Stanley, AndriaTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. in Re Lamonica Fox, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  4. in Re Stephanie Dunlap Hadsall, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2023
  5. in Re: Christopher Glenn Chambers, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API