Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hosken

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1972No. 7353PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

In this original habeas corpus proceeding the only serious question presented is whether or not Relator was deprived of due process of law in the hearing which resulted in his imprisonment. Our review of the proceedings is necessarily limited since we do not exercise appellate, but original jurisdiction. We wrote upon the subject recently in Ex parte Williams, 469 S.W.2d 449, 450 (Tex.Civ.App., Beaumont, 1971, original proceedings), and repeat only a few of the comments made at that time.

For this contempt proceeding to be subject to collateral attack in this habeas corpus…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WerbludTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Donald A. Ridgway v. T.L. Baker, Potter County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Ex Parte KruppsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Ex Parte HiesterTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API