Legal Opinion

Fortuna Estates v. Henna

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided May 18, 1916No. 970Published

Statement of Facts. Tbis is an application for a preliminary injunction to restrain tbe defendants from taking certain water from tbe Jaeaguas river above wbat is called tbe Aruz pump of tbe plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Statement of Facts. Tbis is an application for a preliminary injunction to restrain tbe defendants from taking certain water from tbe Jaeaguas river above wbat is called tbe Aruz pump of tbe plaintiff. Tbe bill, wbieb was sworn to, was filed April 7, 1916, and alleges tbat tbe plaintiff is a corporation owning certain four tracts of land in tbe municipality of Juana Diaz, and bas as appurtenant thereto, by virtue of concessions, decrees and user, tbe right to use tbe waters from tbe Jaeaguas river for tbe irrigation of these lands, to wit: (1) One tract known as tbe estate “Fortuna,”…

1Opinion of the Court

HamxltoN, Judge,

delivered the following opinion:

Before discussing the merits of'the case, it is necessary to consider preliminary objections as to parties and the nature of the relief sought.

1. It is alleged by the respondents that they own only the reversion of one half of the property, and that the other owners are not yet made parties. Equity rule 73 is invoked to show that notice of an application for preliminary injunction must be given to the opposite parties. It does not seem, however, that this is applicable. In some cases a preliminary injunction could not be obtained in time to do…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
  3. Corning v. . Troy Iron and Nail FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Irving v. Joint Dist. Council of New York & Vicinity of United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America & Amalgamated Society of Carpenters & JoinersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
  5. California Pastoral & Agricultural Co. v. Enterprise Canal & Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API