Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re House Bill No. 145

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1951No. 35247PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, C. J.

This action was filed in this court under and by virtue of specific authority provided in House Bill No. 145, 23rd Legislature, to test the constitutionality of said act. In response to the request of the court the Attorney General appears in this case.

By 38 O.S. 1941 §10, it was provided by the first Legislature after the adoption of the Constitution:

“All male citizens residing in this state having the qualifications of electors, . . . , are competent jurors to serve on . . . grand and petit juries within their counties . . . .”

This section was immaterially amended in 1937. 38 O.S. 1941 §28…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Browning v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. State v. ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Tynan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Movants to Quash Multicounty Grand Jury Subpoena v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Movants to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Sherbert v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. Ridinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. IN RE: DETACHMENT OF MUNICIPAL TERRITORY FROM THE CITY OF ADASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API