State v. Chase
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, J.
In 1921 it was deemed expedient so to amend the laws providing for the selection of jurors that women otherwise qualified should be eligible to jury duty. The principal change made by Chapter 273, Laws of 1921, consisted in striking out those words or phrases which limited the persons *266eligible to jury duty to men, inserting in place of tbe word “men” or “male persons” tbe word “persons,” and providing- the terms npon which women summoned as jurors could obtain exemption. In addition to these amendments, no material change was made with the exception of that contained in Section 10, quoted in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kearney v. SnodgrassOregon Supreme Court · 1885
- Commonwealth v. DorseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- State v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. MegordenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Williams v. Pacific Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.