Legal Opinion

Tynan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1924No. 4148PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under the Alaska Bone Dry Law (39 Stat. 903 [48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.]). The assignments of error are directed against the jury as impaneled, against the information, and against testimony obtained through an unlawful search and seizure.

The jury trying the case was composed partly of women, and the plaintiff in error contends that he was entitled to a common-law jury, composed wholly of men. Section 9 *213of the Organic Act of the territory of Alaska (37 Stat. 514 [48 U.S.C.A. §§ 77-79]), provides that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clinton v. EnglebrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. State v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1921
  5. Commonwealth v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. People v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. United States v. Kenneth VottellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Harris v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API