Legal Opinion

A-Fab Eng'g v. Prop. Tax Div. of the Utah State Tax Comm'n

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 23, 2019No. 20180014-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORTENSEN, Judge:

¶1 "[I]n this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes." 1 Nearly as certain is the procedural bar attendant to court challenges when a party has failed to exhaust administrative remedies, resulting in an absence of jurisdiction. A-Fab Engineering (A-Fab) challenges two property tax assessments levied in 2012 and 2013 by the Utah State Tax Commission (Commission). The Commission dismissed A-Fab's administrative appeal as untimely. A-Fab then petitioned the district court for review of the Commission's decision. The district court summarily dismissed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nebeker v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ockey v. Club JamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Amax Magnesium Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Tax Commission v. Spanish ForkUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Labor Commission v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API