Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Mink

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 13, 2001No. Nos. 99-35709, 99-35722PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

After the parties settled this class action, the district court awarded Plaintiffs $989,431.08 in attorney fees, which was about $500,000 less than they had requested. The Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration (“the federal Defendant”) appeals, arguing that the fee award is too large; Plaintiffs cross-appeal, arguing that the fee award is too small. We hold that (1) the district court abused its discretion by failing to deduct' from the award of fees hours that were documented inadequately or that reflected duplicative efforts or excessive…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. H.N. Dang v. Gilbert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Sorenson v. MinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API