Legal Opinion
Ohio Edison Co. v. Zech
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 15, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 88-1695PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a public utility in northern Ohio, claims that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) cannot impartially consider its application to amend and remove certain restrictive conditions imposed pursuant to the anti-trust laws on its license to own and operate the Perry nuclear power plant because of alleged threats by at least one Senator to overrule by legislation any amendments the NRC makes to plaintiff’s license. Plaintiff asserts that these threats make it impossible for the NRC to evaluate its application impartially and, therefore,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
- Börs v. PrestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Ticor Title Insurance Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Ronald Tuck v. Pan American Health OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- North v. Smarsh, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Marchiano v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- McGinn, Smith & Co. v. Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Berka v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- McGinn, Smith & Co., Inc. v. Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.