Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spitzer v. Beveridge

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.

The relator, hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff,” has applied to this court for a writ of mandamus, commanding the defendant, as county clerk of Multnomah County, to forthwith issue execution against the property of the McCormick Steamship Lines, a corporation, and the American Surety Company of New York, a corporation, upon a certain judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff and against the “Annette Rolph,” a vessel, and the above-named parties, as principal and surety, in an action brought by plaintiff to enforce a lien upon the above-named vessel, as authorized by sections 10281-10297,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stuart v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. McJilton v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Sweetser v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. The New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  5. Hudson v. GrafflinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harju v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. Hart RefineriesMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Baldwin v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API