Legal Opinion
United States v. Van Ert
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 6, 1972No. Crim. 69-CR-175PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
Gayle A. Van Ert is under indictment for violating §§ 2113(a) and (d) of Title 18 U.S.C. The defendant has brought a motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the execution of a search warrant on December 4, 1969, based on information from observations made on October 10, 1969.
I have concluded that the defendant’s motion to suppress must be granted because under the law the information presented to the United States Commissioner was too remote in time, and the affidavit in support of the application included no information from which the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Milton James RothCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Harry Carl Schoeneman v. United States of America, Garlan Euel Markham, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Lawrence Lee Guinn, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Coyne v. WatsonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WickhamColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. MarkoOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- United States v. MyersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1982
- United States v. AdlerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. PaulDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988